...her six acres bordered a creek used by endangered fish. The ordinance barred new buildings on the wetland and creek-buffer portions but allowed the owner to keep using an existing warehouse, expand parking on two upland...
Citations: Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City, Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, Murr v. Wisconsin, Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
...her six acres bordered a creek used by endangered fish. The ordinance barred new buildings on the wetland and creek-buffer portions but allowed the owner to keep using an existing warehouse, expand parking on two upland...
Citations: Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City, Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, Murr v. Wisconsin, Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
...e questioning because perception defects are relevant to credibility. Bar the questioning because eyesight is character evidence. Allow it only if Eyewitness has a conviction. Bar it because cross-examination cannot addr...
Citations: Federal Rule of Evidence 611, Federal Rule of Evidence 403
...s Sixth Amendment claims. This essay tests effective assistance, plea bargaining, and conflict-free counsel. Strickland v. Washington, Missouri v. Frye, Cuyler v. Sullivan
Citations: Strickland v. Washington, Missouri v. Frye, Cuyler v. Sullivan
USABarPrep Coach