A photographer sued a publisher in federal court under diversity jurisdiction for a state-law invasion-of-privacy claim. The governing state statute allows emotional-distress damages but requires a reviewing court to set...
Citations: Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Erie R.R. Co. v. Tompkins
...g, Congress enacts a statute saying the Supreme Court lacks appellate jurisdiction over the category of cases and that all pending cases must be dismissed because the government's legal position is correct.Which statemen...
Citations: Ex parte McCardle, United States v. Klein, Marbury v. Madison
...g, Congress enacts a statute saying the Supreme Court lacks appellate jurisdiction over the category of cases and that all pending cases must be dismissed because the government's legal position is correct.Which statemen...
Citations: Ex parte McCardle, United States v. Klein, Marbury v. Madison
...tates District Court for the District of Franklin, invoking diversity jurisdiction and alleging breach of warranty. The product was designed in the forum state, sold through an out-of-state distributor, and delivered to...
Citations: Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co., Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins
...al Benefits Review Act. Section 1 withdraws the lower federal courts' jurisdiction over future suits under the statute and channels new claims to an administrative tribunal with later appellate review. Section 2 states t...
Citations: Ex parte McCardle, United States v. Klein, Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.
...al Benefits Review Act. Section 1 withdraws the lower federal courts' jurisdiction over future suits under the statute and channels new claims to an administrative tribunal with later appellate review. Section 2 states t...
Citations: Ex parte McCardle, United States v. Klein, Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.
...very is a ministerial duty fixed by law. Analyze the judicial-review, jurisdiction, and remedy issues. This essay tests Marbury-style judicial review, original jurisdiction limits, and mandamus for ministerial duties. Ma...
Citations: Marbury v. Madison, U.S. Const. art. III
...very is a ministerial duty fixed by law. Analyze the judicial-review, jurisdiction, and remedy issues. This essay tests Marbury-style judicial review, original jurisdiction limits, and mandamus for ministerial duties. Ma...
Citations: Marbury v. Madison, U.S. Const. art. III
...acted a statute providing: "The Supreme Court shall have no appellate jurisdiction over this category of cases. In all pending cases, the courts shall dismiss the action because the United States' legal position is corre...
Citations: U.S. Const. art. III, sec. 2, Ex parte McCardle, United States v. Klein, Marbury v. Madison
...acted a statute providing: "The Supreme Court shall have no appellate jurisdiction over this category of cases. In all pending cases, the courts shall dismiss the action because the United States' legal position is corre...
Citations: U.S. Const. art. III, sec. 2, Ex parte McCardle, United States v. Klein, Marbury v. Madison
Congress enacted the Equal Access to Courts Act under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Act requires states to provide sign-language interpreters in all criminal, civil, and administrative hearings when a party...
Citations: U.S. Const. amend. XIII, U.S. Const. amend. XIV, sec. 5, City of Boerne v. Flores, United States v. Morrison, Tennessee v. Lane, Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
Congress enacted the Equal Access to Courts Act under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Act requires states to provide sign-language interpreters in all criminal, civil, and administrative hearings when a party...
Citations: U.S. Const. amend. XIII, U.S. Const. amend. XIV, sec. 5, City of Boerne v. Flores, United States v. Morrison, Tennessee v. Lane, Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
...rgeon in federal court sitting in the forum state, invoking diversity jurisdiction and alleging state professional negligence. state law limits recoverable noneconomic damages in professional-negligence actions against h...
Citations: Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc., Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins
...of State A sued a citizen of State B in federal court under diversity jurisdiction for injuries from a boat collision. The defendant impleaded a marina that is also a citizen of State A, seeking indemnity for negligent m...
Citations: Fed. R. Civ. P. 14, 28 U.S.C. 1367(b), 28 U.S.C. 1332
...of State A sued a citizen of State B in federal court under diversity jurisdiction for injuries from a boat collision. The defendant impleaded a marina that is also a citizen of State A, seeking indemnity for negligent m...
Citations: Fed. R. Civ. P. 14, 28 U.S.C. 1367(b), 28 U.S.C. 1332
...of State A sued a citizen of State B in federal court under diversity jurisdiction, seeking specific performance of a contract to buy a lakeside parcel for $1 million. The record shows that the defendant owns the parcel...
Citations: Fed. R. Civ. P. 19, Fed. R. Civ. P. 21, 28 U.S.C. 1332
...of State A sued a citizen of State B in federal court under diversity jurisdiction, seeking specific performance of a contract to buy a lakeside parcel for $1 million. The record shows that the defendant owns the parcel...
Citations: Fed. R. Civ. P. 19, Fed. R. Civ. P. 21, 28 U.S.C. 1332
A defendant's first Rule 12 motion raises lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim but does not raise improper venue. What is the likely effect on the venue defense? The correct answer states the Rule 1...
Citations: Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3), Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)
A defendant's first Rule 12 motion raises lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim but does not raise improper venue. What is the likely effect on the venue defense? The correct answer states the Rule 1...
Citations: Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3), Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)
A jurisdiction provides that, as between successive purchasers of the same land, priority belongs to the purchaser who records first, regardless of notice. Owner conveyed to A, then conveyed to B. B knew of A's deed but...
Citations: Common-law real-property recording-act principles
A state court is deciding whether it has specific personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant. Which statement best describes the constitutional test? The correct answer states the core specific-jurisdiction tes...
Citations: Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court, Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
A state court is deciding whether it has specific personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant. Which statement best describes the constitutional test? The correct answer states the core specific-jurisdiction tes...
Citations: Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court, Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
In a lien-theory jurisdiction, Ian and Jordan own Blackacre as joint tenants with right of survivorship. Ian mortgages his interest to Bank and then dies before foreclosure. Jordan had notice of the mortgage. Which state...
Citations: Common-law concurrent ownership doctrine
...ses? The correct answer states the LLC citizenship rule for diversity jurisdiction. Carden v. Arkoma Associates, Section 1332 diversity principles
Citations: Carden v. Arkoma Associates, Section 1332 diversity principles
USABarPrep Coach