A state law bars any person who owes more than $5,000 in unpaid civil judgments from receiving a marriage license unless the creditor consents. An engaged couple challenges the law after one partner is denied a license b...
Citations: U.S. Const. amend. XIV, Loving v. Virginia, Zablocki v. Redhail, Obergefell v. Hodges
A state law bars any person who owes more than $5,000 in unpaid civil judgments from receiving a marriage license unless the creditor consents. An engaged couple challenges the law after one partner is denied a license b...
Citations: U.S. Const. amend. XIV, Loving v. Virginia, Zablocki v. Redhail, Obergefell v. Hodges
After plaintiffs obtain final Article III judgments against the United States and the time for appeal has passed, Congress enacts a statute requiring federal courts to reopen those judgments and enter judgment for the go...
Citations: Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.
After plaintiffs obtain final Article III judgments against the United States and the time for appeal has passed, Congress enacts a statute requiring federal courts to reopen those judgments and enter judgment for the go...
Citations: Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.
After several plaintiffs won federal-court judgments against the United States under a benefits statute, Congress enacted the Final Benefits Review Act. Section 1 withdraws the lower federal courts' jurisdiction over fut...
Citations: Ex parte McCardle, United States v. Klein, Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.
After several plaintiffs won federal-court judgments against the United States under a benefits statute, Congress enacted the Final Benefits Review Act. Section 1 withdraws the lower federal courts' jurisdiction over fut...
Citations: Ex parte McCardle, United States v. Klein, Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.
...al appeals were pending in the Supreme Court from lower federal-court judgments against the United States, Congress enacted a statute providing: "The Supreme Court shall have no appellate jurisdiction over this category...
Citations: U.S. Const. art. III, sec. 2, Ex parte McCardle, United States v. Klein, Marbury v. Madison
...al appeals were pending in the Supreme Court from lower federal-court judgments against the United States, Congress enacted a statute providing: "The Supreme Court shall have no appellate jurisdiction over this category...
Citations: U.S. Const. art. III, sec. 2, Ex parte McCardle, United States v. Klein, Marbury v. Madison
...er states the ordinary issue preclusion rule. Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
...er states the ordinary issue preclusion rule. Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
...ccurate about issue preclusion? The correct answer states why default judgments usually fail issue preclusion. Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
...ccurate about issue preclusion? The correct answer states why default judgments usually fail issue preclusion. Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
...ernative-ground problem for issue preclusion. Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
...ernative-ground problem for issue preclusion. Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
...nswer states the basic claim preclusion rule. Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
...nswer states the basic claim preclusion rule. Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
...sue preclusion and the default-judgment trap. Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles, General federal preclusion principles
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles, General federal preclusion principles
...sue preclusion and the default-judgment trap. Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles, General federal preclusion principles
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles, General federal preclusion principles
...ternative-ground problem in issue preclusion. Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles, Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles, Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore
...ternative-ground problem in issue preclusion. Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles, Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles, Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore
...lements without overstating issue preclusion. Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
...lements without overstating issue preclusion. Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
Citations: Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
...claim under a new theory. Taylor v. Sturgell, Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
Citations: Taylor v. Sturgell, Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
...claim under a new theory. Taylor v. Sturgell, Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
Citations: Taylor v. Sturgell, Restatement (Second) of Judgments principles
USABarPrep Coach